|
|
Post by Zinn on Sept 26, 2004 20:04:22 GMT -5
I think getting John to be civil is like trying to negotiate with a rabid mongoose.
P.S. I <3 Star Trek.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grove on Sept 26, 2004 20:04:27 GMT -5
I know and I am sorry if my actions have caused you stress. I did not mean to do it intentionally, but it was inevitable in this situation. I am not sure if your statement of 'Ha, organized revolt...I guess I may have invented that in my own mind' was a sarcastic one or not, but i hope it wasnt, because it really isnt one as much as it may seem.
|
|
|
|
Post by Valodya Bassarov on Sept 26, 2004 20:05:04 GMT -5
No that was me trying to make light of the situation....
And if anyone can change John I can, since well, I am an exceptional sort of guy.
Okay tooting my own horn
But I am trying. Trust me, this is very unpleasant for me.
I enjoying having all of you on the rpg
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter "The Owl" on Sept 26, 2004 20:07:33 GMT -5
If you get him to respect his characters, the characters of others, and the players who play them, that will be enough for me. I value characters greatly, including other people's.
And we agreed to do this three days ago. I ment to say something about is sooner but I forgot.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matsumura on Sept 26, 2004 20:10:37 GMT -5
Well then, in the words of Captain Kirk, "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Now then, it appears this argument has returned to a calm level of civilization once again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Valodya Bassarov on Sept 26, 2004 20:11:10 GMT -5
Well I could make Mischa a special John Moderator to make sure he follows through on the above requests
It could be a probationary period where we see if John can adhere to our expecations of civility, if he fails to, then he is banned
Does that sound reasonable?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zinn on Sept 26, 2004 20:12:51 GMT -5
I vote yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matsumura on Sept 26, 2004 20:13:32 GMT -5
Sounds good to me
|
|
|
|
Post by JohnHater on Sept 26, 2004 20:14:44 GMT -5
No, just ban John.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter "The Owl" on Sept 26, 2004 20:14:53 GMT -5
Truly you have the Heart of the Paddle.
I find the terms to be agreeable.
|
|
|
|
Post by "Zero" Americanski on Sept 26, 2004 20:15:09 GMT -5
Considering this is close to what I suggested, I agree.
I have tried to stay out of this issue, just advising Bassarov and others on the issue. John may be an uncooperative not a very nice person, but he is a good, effective player and we can't afford to simply throw him out of the game. On the other hand, a lot of us seem to be taking this far more seriously than we should be. IT'S A f**kING GAME.
There, that's my two cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by Peter "The Owl" on Sept 26, 2004 20:16:56 GMT -5
A game? Don't be little my way of life.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matsumura on Sept 26, 2004 20:17:44 GMT -5
A guest by the name of JohnHater..... I wonder if his responses would be bias...
|
|
|
|
Post by Mikhael Nadyezhda (Mischa) on Sept 26, 2004 20:21:05 GMT -5
Ahh well, I'm up for the task, and I agree with Zero. It's game, please be mellow...
I don't want to see this turn into a game of whack a mole by trying to appease everybody. Everything will work out, and yes, Star Trek rocks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mikhael Nadyezhda (Mischa) on Sept 26, 2004 20:21:31 GMT -5
Oh, and, I vote yes.
|
|
